4.7 Article

Estradiol therapy in adulthood reverses glial and neuronal alterations caused by perinatal asphyxia

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY
Volume 223, Issue 2, Pages 615-622

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2010.02.010

Keywords

Hippocampus; Perinatal asphyxia; 17 beta Estradiol; Neuroprotection; Neurofilament; MAP-2; GFAP

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, Spain [BFU2008-02950-C03-01]
  2. IBRO [2008]
  3. MAEC-AECID [2008]
  4. CONICET (Argentina)
  5. [UBACYTM407]
  6. [PIP5784]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The capacity of the ovarian hormone 17 beta-estradiol to prevent neurodegeneration has been characterized in several animal models of brain and spinal cord pathology. However, the potential reparative activity of the hormone under chronic neurodegenerative conditions has received less attention. In this study we have assessed the effect of estradiol therapy in adulthood on chronic glial and neuronal alterations caused by perinatal asphyxia (PA) in rats. Four-month-old male Sprague-Dawley rats submitted to PA just after delivery, and their control littermates, were injected for 3 consecutive days with 17 beta estradiol or vehicle. Animals subjected to PA and treated with vehicle showed an increased astrogliosis, focal swelling and fragmented appearance of MAP-2 immunoreactive dendrites, decreased MAP-2 immunoreactivity and decreased phosphorylation of high and medium molecular weight neurofilaments in the hippocampus, compared to control animals. Estradiol therapy reversed these alterations. These findings indicate that estradiol is able to reduce, in adult animals, chronic reactive astrogliosis and neuronal alterations caused by an early developmental neurodegenerative event, suggesting that the hormone might induce reparative actions in the Central Nervous System (CNS). (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available