4.7 Article

Reorganization of sensory processing below the level of spinal cord injury as revealed by fMRl

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY
Volume 209, Issue 1, Pages 155-160

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2007.09.017

Keywords

spinal cord fMRI; rat; spinal cord injury; plasticity; BOLD contrast

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The adult mammalian CNS undergoes plastic changes in response to injury. To investigate such changes in spinal cord, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was applied in rats subjected to complete transection of the mid-thoracic spinal cord. Blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) contrasts were recorded in the distal spinal cord different times after injury (3, 7, and 14 days, and 1, 3, and 6 months) in response to electrical hind limb stimulation. Functional MRI demonstrated a substantial increase of neuronal activation in the ipsilateral dorsal horn after injury. Notably, 0.5 mA, which did not evoke activation in the normal spinal cord and was considered a non-painful stimulus, induced significant BOLD responses in the dorsal horn after injury. Increased sensitivity was also seen in response to 1.0 m-A stimulation. Our results suggest exaggerated responsiveness of spinal neurons after spinal cord injury. Reorganization in the injured spinal cord has been shown to involve the amplification of peripheral inputs and implicated as one underlying mechanism causing neuropathic pain and autonomic dysreflexia. Since BOLD signals can demonstrate such plastic changes in spinal cord parenchyma, we propose fMRI as a method to monitor functional reorganization in the spinal cord after injury. Combining brain and spinal cord fMRI allows the visualization of neuronal activities along the entire neuroaxis and thereby an evaluation of the different plastic responses to CNS injuries that occur in the brain and the spinal cord. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available