4.3 Article

Using GIS to Delineate Headwater Stream Origins in the Appalachian Coalfields of Kentucky

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION
Volume 51, Issue 6, Pages 1667-1687

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1752-1688.12350

Keywords

geospatial analysis; surface water hydrology; rivers; streams; watershed management; planning

Funding

  1. United States Department of Agriculture, Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension, Precision Agriculture: Precision Resource Management V [2009-34628-20231]
  2. NIFA [581283, 2009-34628-20231] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Headwater streams have a significant nexus or physical, chemical, and/or biological connection to downstream reaches. Generally, defined as 1st-3rd order with ephemeral, intermittent, or perennial flow regimes, these streams account for a substantial portion of the total stream network particularly in mountainous terrain. Due to their often remote locations, small size, and large numbers, conducting field inventories of headwater streams is challenging. A means of estimating headwater stream location and extent according to flow regime type using publicly available spatial data is needed to simplify this complex process. Using field-collected headwater point of origin data from three control watersheds, streams were characterized according to a set of spatial parameters related to topography, geology, and soils. These parameters were (1) compared to field-collected point of origin data listed in three nearby Jurisdictional Determinations, (2) used to develop a geographic information system (GIS)-based stream network for identifying ephemeral, intermittent, and perennial streams, and (3) applied to a larger watershed and compared to values obtained using the high-resolution National Hydrography Dataset (NHD). The parameters drainage area and local valley slope were the most reliable predictors of flow regime type. Results showed the high-resolution NHD identified no ephemeral streams and 9 and 65% fewer intermittent and perennial streams, respectively, than the GIS model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available