4.1 Article

Evidence for in vivo nicotine-induced alveolar interstitial fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transdifferentiation

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL LUNG RESEARCH
Volume 36, Issue 7, Pages 390-398

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3109/01902141003714023

Keywords

development; fibroblast; lung; pregnancy; smoke; transdifferentiation

Funding

  1. NIH [HL75405, HD51857, HD058948, HL55268]
  2. TRDRP [14RT-0073, 15IT-0250]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nicotine exposure alters normal homeostatic pulmonary epithelial-mesenchymal paracrine signaling pathways, resulting in alveolar interstitial fibroblast (AIF)-to-myofibroblast (MYF) transdifferentiation. Though this has been described under in vitro conditions, it is not known if the same phenomenon also takes place in vivo. A well-established rodent model of lung damage following perinatal nicotine exposure was used. By probing for the well-established markers of fibroblast differentiation (parathyroid hormone-related protein [PTHrP], peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma [PPAR gamma], adipocyte differentiation-related protein, alpha-smooth muscle actin, and fibronectin) at the mRNA, protein, and tissue levels, the authors provide the first in vivo evidence for nicotine-induced AIF-to-MYF transdifferentiation. In addition, these data also provide the first evidence for nicotine-induced up-regulation of Wnt signaling, accompanying the down-regulation of PTHrP/PPAR gamma signaling in vivo following nicotine exposure during pregnancy. These data provide an integrated mechanism for in utero nicotine-induced lung damage and how it could permanently alter the developmental program of the developing lung by disrupting critically important epithelial-mesenchymal interactions. More importantly, these data are likely to provide specific interventions to augment the pulmonary mesenchymal lipogenic pathway to ameliorate nicotine-induced in utero lung injury.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available