4.1 Article

SIMVASTATIN RESTORES DOWN-REGULATED GATA-6 EXPRESSION IN PULMONARY HYPERTENSIVE RATS

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL LUNG RESEARCH
Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages 411-426

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01902140902736819

Keywords

pulmonary hypertension; statins; transcription factor; vascular remodeling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation has been known to be predominant in vascular remodeling of pulmonary hypertensive. The GATA family proteins, a group of zinc finger transcription factors, play an important role during cell proliferation. The aim of present study was to investigate the expression of GATA-6 gene in experimental pulmonary hypertensive rats and explore the effect of regulation of GATA-6 expression by simvastatin on pulmonary vascular remodeling. The male Sprague-Dawley rats model was established with receiving pneumonectomy and monocrotaline (MCT) administration. Right pulmonary artery remodeling in these animals was compared with unti-eated rats or rats receiving simvastatin. The Level of GATA-6 mRNA and protein expression was detected by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Western blotting, respectively. Pneumonectomized, MCT-treated rats had significantly increased, mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP), RV/(LV + S) ratio (ratio of the right ventricular to left ventricular and septum weights), vascular occlusion scores (VOSs), and percent media wall thickness on day 35, all the indices were significantly decreased after simvastatin, administration in these rats. The level of GATA-6 mRNA and protein were markedly decreased in these pneumonectomy and MCT-treated rats, and they were significantly up-regulated in these rats after receiving simvastatin. These results indicate that the development and progression, of pulmonary hypertension is prevented, by simvastatin by up-regulating GATA-6 expression in the lung tissue.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available