4.2 Article

Phenotypic correction of hemophilia A in sheep by postnatal intraperitoneal transplantation of FVIII-expressing MSC

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL HEMATOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 12, Pages 1124-1135

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2011.09.001

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL073737]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We recently re-established a line of sheep that accurately mimics the clinical symptoms and genetics of severe hemophilia A (HA). Here, we tested a novel, nonablative transplantation therapy in two pediatric HA animals. Paternal mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) were transduced with a porcine FVIII-encoding lentivector and transplanted via the intraperitoneal route without preconditioning. At the time of transplantation, these animals had received multiple human FVIII treatments for various spontaneous bleeds and had developed debilitating hemarthroses, which produced severe defects in posture and gait. Transplantation of transduced MSC resolved all existent hemarthroses, and spontaneous bleeds ceased. Damaged joints recovered fully; the animals regained normal posture and gait and resumed normal activity. Despite achieving factor-independence, a sharp rise in pre-existent Bethesda titers occurred following transplantation, decreasing the effectiveness and duration of therapy. Postmortem examination revealed widespread engraftment, with MSC present within the lung, liver, intestine, and thymus, but particularly within joints affected at the time of transplantation, suggesting MSC homed to sites of ongoing injury/inflammation to release FVIII, explaining the dramatic improvement in hemarthrotic joints. In summary, this novel, nonablative MSC transplantation was straightforward, safe, and converted life-threatening, debilitating HA to a moderate phenotype in a large animal model. (C) 2011 ISEH - Society for Hematology and Stem Cells. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available