4.2 Article

Polymorphisms in Toll-like receptor genes and susceptibility to infections in allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL HEMATOLOGY
Volume 37, Issue 9, Pages 1022-1029

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2009.06.004

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Specific Targeted Research Project MANASP (Luxembourg) (LSHE-CT-2006) [037899]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [POCI/SAU-ESP/61080/2004] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. Discovery of genetic variations in the genes encoding for Toll-like receptors (TLRs) has highlighted a potential link between genomic variation of the host and susceptibility to infections. Materials and Methods. We investigated the association between polymorphisms in the TLR2, TLR4, and TLR9 genes in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant and susceptibility to infections caused by cytomegalovirus and filamentous fungi. Results. A significant association was observed between the presence of the T-1237C polymorphism (TLR9) and susceptibility to viral pneumonia (p = 0.04; odds ratio [OR]: 1.73). For fungi, a significant association was observed between the presence of the cosegregating Asp299Gly/Thr399IIe polymorphisms (TLR4) and fungal colonization (p = 0.003; OR: 10.6). However, susceptibility to fungal infections, predominantly fungal pneumonia, was instead significantly decreased in the presence of the same polymorphisms (P = 0.03; OR: 0.23). Conclusion. Thus, fungal colonization may not predict susceptibility to infection in the presence of these single nucleotide polymorphisms. The finding that defective viral but not fungal sensing may predict susceptibility to infection highlights the divergent function of TLRs in the pathogenesis of opportunistic infections. (C) 2009 ISEH - Society for Hematology and Stem Cells. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available