4.2 Article

Enrichment of hematopoietic stem cells with SLAM and LSK markers for the detection of hematopoietic stem cell function in normal and Trp53 null mice

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL HEMATOLOGY
Volume 36, Issue 10, Pages 1236-1243

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2008.04.012

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [Z99 HL999999] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. To test function of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in vivo in C57BL/6 (136) and Trp53-deficient (Trp53 null) mice by using two HSC enrichment schemes. Materials and Methods. Bone marrow (BM) Lin(-)CD41(-)CD48(-)CD150(+) (signaling lymphocyte activation molecules [SLAM]), Lin(-)CD41(-)CD48(-)CD150(-) (SLAM(-)) and Lin(-)Scal(+)CD117(+) (LSK) cells were defined by fluorescence-activated cell staining (FACS). Cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) level was also analyzed by FACS. Sorted SLAM, SLAM(-), and LSK cells were tested in vivo in the competitive repopulation (CR) and serial transplantation assays. Results. SLAM cell fraction was 0.0078% +/- 0.0010% and 0.0135% +/- 0.0010% of total BM cells in B6 and Trp53 null mice, and was highly correlated (R-2 = 0.7116) with LSK cells. CD150(+) BM cells also contained more ROS cells than did CD150(-) cells. B6 SLAM cells repopulated recipients much better than B6 SLAM- cells, showing high HSC enrichment. B6 SLAM cells also engrafted recipients better than Trp53 null SLAM cells in the CR and the follow-up serial transplantation assays. Similarly, LSK cells from B6 donors also had higher repopulating ability than those from Trp53 null donors. However, whole BM cells from the same B6 and Trp53 null donors showed the opposite functional trend in recipient engraftment. Conclusion. Both SLAM and LSK marker sets can enrich HSCs from B6 and Trp53 mice. Deficiency of Trp53 upregulates HSC self-renewal but causes no gain of HSC function. (C) 2008 ISEH - Society for Hematology and Stem Cells. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available