4.6 Article

Changes in inflammatory gene expression induced by hyperbaric oxygen treatment in human endothelial cells under chronic wound conditions

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH
Volume 318, Issue 3, Pages 207-216

Publisher

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2011.10.014

Keywords

Oxidative stress; Nitric oxide; Interleukin-8; Gene regulation; Chronic inflammation

Funding

  1. Diving Diseases Research Centre, Plymouth, UK [RR100098]
  2. Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy involves the inhalation of 100% oxygen, whilst inside a chamber at greater than atmospheric pressure. It is an effective treatment for chronic diabetic wounds, although the molecular mechanisms involved remain unclear. We hypothesised that HBO could alter inflammatory gene expression in human endothelial cells via a reactive oxygen/nitrogen species-mediated pathway. Endothelial cells were exposed to a chronic wound model comprising hypoxia (2% O-2 at 1 atmosphere absolute (ATA); PO2 similar to 2 kPa) in the presence of lipopolysaccharide and TNF-alpha for 24 h, then treated with HBO for 90 min (97.5% O-2 at 2.4 ATA; PO2 similar to 237 kPa). 5 h post-HBO, 19 genes involved in adhesion, angiogenesis, inflammation and oxidative stress were downregulated. Notably, only angiogenin gene expression, which promotes both angiogenesis and nitric oxide production (reflected by increased eNOS protein expression in this study), was upregulated. This led to a decrease in endothelial IL-8 mRNA and protein, which could help alleviate inflammatory processes during chronic wound healing. This was no longer evident 22.5 h post-HBO, demonstrating the importance of daily exposures in HBO treatment protocols. These studies indicate that elevated oxygen transiently regulates inflammatory gene expression in endothelial cells, which may enhance chronic wound healing. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available