4.6 Article

Nuclear translocation of the 1,25D3-MARRS (membrane associated rapid response to steroids) receptor protein and NFκB in differentiating NB4 leukemia cells

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH
Volume 316, Issue 7, Pages 1101-1108

Publisher

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.01.010

Keywords

Vitamin D-3; Monocyte; Macrophage; Acute promyelocytic leukemia; Confocal microscopy; Hormone signaling; Trafficking

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences Engineering Research Council of Canada (KM)
  2. Utah State University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

1,25 Dihydroxyvitamin D-3 (1,25D(3)) primes NB4 promyelocytic leukemia cells to differentiate along the monocyte/macrophage lineage through a non-genomic mechanism. Here we show that NB4 cells express high levels of the recently identified membrane receptor for 1,2503, which is a distinct gene product from the classical nuclear vitamin D receptor. This 57 kDa protein, named 1,25D(3)-MARRS (Membrane Activated Rapid Response to Steroids)/ERp57/PIA3 appears to associate in a complex with the transcription factor, nuclear factor kappa B (NF kappa B). In unstimulated cells, 1,25D(3)-MARRS can be co-immunoprecipitated with antibodies directed at NF kappa B, and NF kappa B is co-precipitated when antibodies against 1,25D3-MARRS or ERp57 are used. Confocal microscopy and subcellular fractionation studies demonstrate that both 1,25D3-MARRS and NF kappa B begin translocating to the nucleus within minutes of co-stimulation with 1,2503 and phorbol ester. The predominant nuclear localization of both proteins precedes the expression of the monocyte/macrophage phenotype and suggests that this event may be critical to the differentiation pathway. This suggests a role for 1,25D3-MARRS in the nucleus as a regulator of gene expression. Here it may also regulate the activity of NF kappa B and other factors with which it may be interacting. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available