4.6 Article

The specific contribution of hypoxia-inducible factor-2α to hypoxic gene expression in vitro is limited and modulated by cell type-specific and exogenous factors

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH
Volume 314, Issue 10, Pages 2016-2027

Publisher

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2008.03.003

Keywords

hypoxia; gene array; RNA interference; siRNA; transcription factor; Hep3B cells; renal carcinoma; hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cellular integrity in hypoxia is dependent on molecular adaptations dominated by the heterodimeric transcription factor hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF). The HIF complex contains one of two alternative oxygen-regulated alpha-subunits considered to play distinct roles in the hypoxia response. Although HIF-2 alpha may be more important in tumour biology and erythropoiesis, the spectrum of individual target genes is still insufficiently characterized. We therefore performed an Affymetrix gene array on Hep3B cells stimulated with a hypoxia-mimetic and transfected with either HIF-1 alpha or HIF-2 alpha siRNA. 271 transcripts were found to be induced HIF-dependently, including most previously identified HIF targets and a number of novel genes. Most were influenced by HIF-1 alpha knock-down, whereas a smaller number were regulated by HIF-2 alpha. Validation of a selection of genes by RNase protection confirmed the hypoxic regulation and HIF-1 alpha or HIF-2 alpha-dependency in most cases, with the latter showing a lower amplitude. Many HIF-2 alpha targets also responded to HIF-1 alpha knock-down. Interestingly, regulation by HIF-2 alpha was markedly influenced not only by cell type, but also by cell culture conditions, features that were not shared with HIF-1 alpha-regulated genes. Thus, HIF-2 alpha effects are modulated by a number of intrinsic and extrinsic factors which may be most relevant in tumour cells. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available