4.6 Article

Diverse hematopoietic potentials of five human embryonic stem cell lines

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH
Volume 314, Issue 16, Pages 2930-2940

Publisher

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2008.07.019

Keywords

human embryonic stem cells; mesodermal differentiation; hematopoiesis; hematopoietic differentiation; erythroid; erythropoietic differentiation; globin expression

Funding

  1. NIH [K01 DK077864, R01 HL46557]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite a growing body of literature concerning the hematopoietic differentiation of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs), the full hematopoietic potential of the majority of existing hESC lines remains unknown. In this study, the hematopoietic response of five NIH-approved hESC lines (H1, hSF6, BG01, BG02, and BG03) was compared. Our data show that despite expressing similar hESC markers under self-renewing conditions and initiating mesodermal differentiation under spontaneous differentiation conditions, marked differences in subsequent hematopoietic differentiation potential among these lines existed. A high degree of hematopoietic differentiation was attained only by H1 and BG02, whereas this process appeared to be abortive in nature for hSF6, BG01, and BG03. This difference in hematopoietic differentiation predisposition was readily apparent during spontaneous differentiation, and further augmented under hematopoietic-inducing conditions. This predisposition appeared to be intrinsic to the specific hESC line and independent of passage number or gender karyotype. Interestingly, HI and BG02 displayed remarkable similarities in their kinetics of hematopoietic marker expression, hernatopoietic colony formation, erythroid differentiation, and globin expression, suggesting that a similar, predetermined differentiation sequence is followed. The identification of intrinsic and extrinsic factors governing the hematopoietic differentiation potential of hESCs will be of great importance for the putative clinical utility of hESC lines. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available