4.7 Article

Age and amyloid effects on human central nervous system amyloid-beta kinetics

Journal

ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 78, Issue 3, Pages 439-453

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ana.24454

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R01NS065667, K23AG030946, P50 AG05681, P01 AG03991, UL1 RR024992, P30 DK056341, P41 GM103422, P30 DK020579]
  2. Adler Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveAge is the single greatest risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD), with the incidence doubling every 5 years after age 65. However, our understanding of the mechanistic relationship between increasing age and the risk for AD is currently limited. We therefore sought to determine the relationship between age, amyloidosis, and amyloid-beta (A) kinetics in the central nervous system (CNS) of humans. MethodsA kinetics were analyzed in 112 participants and compared to the ages of participants and the amount of amyloid deposition. ResultsWe found a highly significant correlation between increasing age and slowed A turnover rates (2.5-fold longer half-life over five decades of age). In addition, we found independent effects on A42 kinetics specifically in participants with amyloid deposition. Amyloidosis was associated with a higher (>50%) irreversible loss of soluble A42 and a 10-fold higher A42 reversible exchange rate. InterpretationThese findings reveal a mechanistic link between human aging and the risk of amyloidosis, which may be owing to a dramatic slowing of A turnover, increasing the likelihood of protein misfolding that leads to deposition. Alterations in A kinetics associated with aging and amyloidosis suggest opportunities for diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. More generally, this study provides an example of how changes in protein turnover kinetics can be used to detect physiological and pathophysiological changes and may be applicable to other proteinopathies. Ann Neurol 2015;78:439-453

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available