4.4 Article

Insulin resistance induces medial artery calcification in fructose-fed rats

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 237, Issue 1, Pages 50-57

Publisher

ROYAL SOC MEDICINE PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1258/ebm.2011.011252

Keywords

insulin resistance; medial artery calcification; fructose; vascular smooth muscle cells; bone-related protein

Funding

  1. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University, Education Ministry of China [NCET-05-0016]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30470693, 30871013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Osteogenic differentiation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) results in medial artery calcification, which is common in diabetes, but the pathogenesis is poorly understood. We aimed to explore the pathophysiological roles of insulin resistance (IR) on medial artery calcification in rats with 10% fructose in drinking water. After 12 weeks of fructose feeding, rats showed severe IR, with increased levels of fasting blood glucose, serum insulin and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Fructose-fed rats showed aortic calcification, increased aortic calcium deposition and irregular elastic fibers in the medial layer of the vessel wall. Moreover, plasma phosphorus concentration, calcium x phosphorus product and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, and aortic calcium content and ALP activity were significantly increased. Fructose feeding increased mRNA levels of osteopontin, type Ill sodium-dependent phosphate co-transporter, bone morphogenetic protein-2 and the key transcription factor core binding factor alpha 1 in aortic tissue and downregulated mRNA levels of osteoprotegerin and matrix gamma-carboxyglutamic acid protein. Fructose feeding decreased protein levels of smooth-muscle lineage markers and induced severe lipid peroxidation injury. IR induced by high fructose feeding could evoke osteogenic transdifferentiation of VSMCs and promote vascular calcification.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available