4.4 Article

Sitagliptin lowers glucagon and improves glucose tolerance in prediabetic obese SHROB rats

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 236, Issue 3, Pages 309-314

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1258/ebm.2010.010161

Keywords

genetic obesity; insulin resistance; metabolic syndrome; DPP-IV inhibitors; sitagliptin; sulfonylureas; glyburide

Funding

  1. Merck

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The SHROB (spontaneously hypertensive rat - obese strain) is a model of prediabetes and metabolic syndrome with insulin resistance, glucose intolerance and hypertension. Inhibitors of dipeptidyl dipeptidase IV (DPP-IV) are effective hypoglycemic agents in type 2 diabetes through potentiation of incretin hormones that act in the pancreas to increase insulin and decrease glucagon release. We sought to determine whether the DPP-IV inhibitor sitagliptin might be effective in prediabetes relative to standard therapy with the sulfonylurea glyburide, by using the SHROB model. SHROB show normal fasting glucose but are insulin resistant and hyperglucagonemic. SHROB were treated for six weeks with vehicle, sitagliptin (30 mg/kg/d) or glyburide (1 mg/kg/d) and compared with untreated lean spontaneously hypertensive rats. Body weight, food intake and fasting glucose were all unchanged in all three SHROB groups, but glucagon was reduced by 33% by sitagliptin while remaining unchanged following glyburide or vehicle. In oral glucose (6 g/kg) tolerance testing, both sitagliptin and glyburide lowered plasma glucose. Both sitagliptin and glyburide shifted peak insulin secretion earlier (30 min for glyburide and 60 min for sitagliptin but 240 min for vehicle). Only sitagliptin significantly enhanced insulin secretion. Sitagliptin is effective in normalizing excess glucagon levels and delaying exaggerated insulin secretion in response to a glucose challenge in a prediabetic model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available