4.7 Article

Dynamics of Retinal Injury after Acute Optic Neuritis

Journal

ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 77, Issue 3, Pages 517-528

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ana.24351

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain [PS09/00259, RD07/0060/01, RD12/0032/0002, CM11/00240]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveWe set out to assess the dynamics of retinal injury after acute optic neuritis (ON) and their association with clinical visual outcomes. MethodsThirty-one consecutive patients with acute ON were prospectively analyzed over a 6-month follow-up period. Each month, we used optical coherence tomography (OCT) to assess the thickness of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) and segmented macular layers, as well as high-contrast visual acuity, low-contrast visual acuity (LCVA), color visual acuity (CVA), and visual fields (VF). ResultsIn this prospective study, we found that 6 months after clinical onset, ON eyes suffered a reduction in pRNFL (-45.3 m) and macular thickness (-17.3 m). Macular atrophy was due to the decrease of macular RNFL thickness (-7.8 m) and that of the ganglion cell layer and inner plexiform layer (GCIP, -11.3 m), whereas the thickness of the outer retinal layers increased slightly. The macular RNFL and GCIP thickness decreased in parallel, yet it always occurred more rapidly and more severely for the GCIP. The change in the GCIP thickness in the first month predicted the visual impairment by month 6; a decreaseof 4.5 m predicted poor LCVA (sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 88%), and a decrease of7 m predicted poor VF and CVA (sensitivity of 78% and 100% and specificity of 63% and 66%, respectively). InterpretationRetinal axonal and neuronal damage develops quickly after ON onset. Assessment of ganglion cell layer thickness by OCT after ON onset can be used as an imaging marker of persistent visual disability. Ann Neurol 2015;77:517-528

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available