4.1 Article

Alternate Versions of a Fixed-Choice, Delay-Discounting Assessment for Repeated-Measures Designs

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages 503-508

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/pha0000211

Keywords

delay discounting; Monetary Choice Questionnaire; repeated-measures design

Funding

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [K02 DA034767, R01 DA011692] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Delay discounting, reflected in the tendency to prefer immediate rewards over delayed rewards, is associated with most forms of problematic substance use. When assessed multiple times to examine within-individual changes, for example, following acute drug administration or an intervention, shifts in delay discounting simply because of repeated assessment is a concern, particularly when the assessment task is identical. This may be true for the Monetary Choice Questionnaire (MCQ), a widely used, fixed-item assessment of delay discounting. The present research examined possible within-individual difference/equivalence of MCQ indices at test/retest. This was contrasted with within-individual difference/equivalence when using an alternate version of the MCQ at retest, specifically developed to maintain the assessment structure and scoring of the original MCQ but with different choice items. Eighty-four participants completed delay discounting at test and retest with a 1-week interval; participants were randomized to complete the MCQ at both test and retest (MCQ/MCQ; n = 43) or complete the MCQ at test and an alternate version of the MCQ at retest (MCQ/MCQ-A; n = 41). Conventional hypothesis testing indicated no significant changes in delay discounting in the MCQ/MCQ condition or MCQ/MCQ-A condition. However, equivalence analysis, which is able to established whether scores are statistically equivalent, indicated that test/retest scores were not equivalent in some cases. Specifically, only 1 magnitude in the MCQ/MCQ condition was equivalent at test/retest, whereas 2 magnitudes in the MCQ/MCQ-A condition were equivalent at test/retest. Public Health Significance This study examines scores obtained from an established paper-and-pencil assessment of delay discounting at a 1-week interval. An alternate version of the assessment provided comparable results and could be implemented in instances in which different assessment items are necessary or preferable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available