4.1 Article

Dipeptidyl-Peptidase 4 and Attractin Expression is Increased in Circulating Blood Monocytes of Obese Human Subjects

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & DIABETES
Volume 118, Issue 8, Pages 473-477

Publisher

JOHANN AMBROSIUS BARTH VERLAG MEDIZINVERLAGE HEIDELBERG GMBH
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1249014

Keywords

diabetes; autoimmunity; incretins; immune system

Funding

  1. Deutsche Diabetes Stiftung [230/08/08]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dipeptidyl-peptidase (DPP)-4, which catalizes the degradation of the insulinotropic incretin glucagon-like-peptide (GLP)-1, and the DPP-4 like enzyme attractin are involved in activation of T-lymphocytes and monocytes. Recently, it has been demonstrated, that the risk for certain infections is increased in type 2 diabetic patients under DPP-4 inhibitor treatment. The aim of the present study was to examine the expression of DPP-4 and attractin in circulating blood monocytes of obese and type 2 diabetic subjects. Monocytes were isolated by CD14-antibody based magnetic cell sorting from blood samples of 17 lean controls, 20 obese, non-diabetic subjects and 19 obese patients with type 2 diabetes. FACS analysis was performed to test purity of the cell preparations. Expression was measured by multiplex RT-PCR on RNA-level. DPP-4 and attractin were detectable in human circulating monocytes with attractin being expressed at higher levels compared to DPP-4. Both enzymes were significantly higher expressed in circulating blood monocytes of obese subjects compared to lean controls. In contrast, type 2 diabetes did not significantly affect expression levels. Finally, neither DPP-4 nor attractin expression was altered by sitagliptin or insulin treatment. In conclusion, our data demonstrate, that expressions of DPP4 and attractin in circulating blood monocytes of human subjects are influenced by metabolic abnormalities with obesity being an important factor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available