Journal
EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Volume 41, Issue 3, Pages 494-502Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11692-014-9275-6
Keywords
Allometry; Developmental constraints; Heterochrony; Morphogenesis; Morphological integration; Morphological novelty
Categories
Funding
- European Commission [PIOF-GA-2008-219676]
- Howard University College of Medicine
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Correlation patterns have been widely used in evolutionary studies for exploring the role of development in channelling morphological evolution. The approach was firstly introduced by Olson and Miller in the 1950s, but it did not gain prominence until the 1980s, due to some extent to Gould and Lewontin's (Proc R Soc Lond B 205:581-598, 1979) assertion of the importance of considering organisms as integrated entities, where the internal organization of a structure, and not only the selective regime acting upon it, would play a fundamental role in its evolution. Here we show that this approach, mainly focused on the study of small, quantitative shape changes of existing structures, does not deal with a fundamental aspect of developmental systems, that is, their intrinsic capacity of originating morphological novelties. We show that only when the physicochemical processes underlying morphogenesis and pattern formation are taken into account, would the causal role of development be fully incorporated into the evolutionary view.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available