4.2 Review

On the Possible Shapes of the Brain

Journal

EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages 600-612

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11692-012-9201-8

Keywords

Brain development; Brain evolution; Cortical folding; Mathematical modelling; Neuroanatomy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The human brain is unique among primates in its complexity and variability. Here I argue that this variability is, however, strongly constrained by developmental processes common to all mammals. Comparative analyses of grey and white matter volume, cortical surface area and cortical folding show that the rostro-caudal axis of the central nervous system is a main direction along which mammalian neuroanatomical diversity is organised. Phylogenetically, rostral structures are often disproportionately larger and more differentiated in large mammals compared with small ones. Ontogenetically, caudal structures differentiate earlier but show less variation among species than rostral structures, which differentiate later and for a longer period. Theoretical considerations suggest that growth oriented along the rostro-caudal axis should produce non-linear differences in white matter volume and cortical folding. Growth appears then as a fundamental parameter to understand mammalian neuroanatomical variability, whose effects should be common to all species. This seems to be indeed the case for humans: the volume of different brain structures as well as changes in the extension and folding of the cerebral cortex resemble the trends observed across mammals. A strong global pattern of coordinated variability emerges, where differences in total brain volume are non-linearly related to local neuroanatomical changes. Finally, I review evidence suggesting that the changes related to this global pattern of variability may have an influence on the organisation of behaviour, modulating the development of certain cognitive traits or even affecting the susceptibility to psychiatric disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available