4.2 Review

Modifier Selection by Transgenes: The Case of Growth Hormone Transgenesis and Hyperactive Circling Mice

Journal

EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages 267-286

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11692-008-9036-5

Keywords

Modifier genes; Genetically modified organisms; Stabilising selection; Growth hormone; Dopamine; Behaviour; Counterspin (Cr) mice

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RGPIN A0544]
  2. Canadian Institutes for Health Research [MOP- 64424]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Deleterious impacts of major mutations can be ameliorated by stabilising selection acting on modifier genes. We hypothesise that a new hyperactive circling mouse (counterspin: Cr) arises when modifier genes inadvertently selected to ameliorate the negative impacts of a growth hormone transgenic insertion segregate into the normal genetic background that lacks the transgene. We hypothesise that such modifiers generate a phenotype mirror image'' to the transgenics on the otherwise normal background. We highlight this by testing a priori hypotheses that counterspin and transgenic growth hormone mice deviate oppositely from normal mice across a broad spectrum of characteristics. Results spanning growth, sensorimotor performance, cognition and striatal neuro-transmitters provide strong circumstantial evidence for the hypothesis. In a more direct test for selection in the transgenic mice, we found that those examined in 2008 slept similar to 3 h/d less than they did 14 years ago (P < 0.0005). This is a profound change strongly supporting the reality of modifier selection in these mice. Our results highlight that modifiers may act powerfully on genetically engineered constructs given a genetically variable background. Furthermore, we suggest that modifier selection might provide a novel method for deriving genetic models, and specifically, models phenotypically opposite to engineered constructs or natural mutations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available