4.6 Article

Genomic regions in crop-wild hybrids of lettuce are affected differently in different environments: implications for crop breeding

Journal

EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages 629-640

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2012.00240.x

Keywords

crop-wild hybrids; fitness; hitchhiking; Lactuca; mitigation strategy; quantitative trait loci; selection; transgenic plants

Funding

  1. Dutch Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) as part of the ERGO program [838.06.042]
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [CEH010021] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many crops contain domestication genes that are generally considered to lower fitness of cropwild hybrids in the wild environment. Transgenes placed in close linkage with such genes would be less likely to spread into a wild population. Therefore, for environmental risk assessment of GM crops, it is important to know whether genomic regions with such genes exist, and how they affect fitness. We performed quantitative trait loci (QTL) analyses on fitness(-related) traits in two different field environments employing recombinant inbred lines from a cross between cultivated Lactuca sativa and its wild relative Lactuca serriola. We identified a region on linkage group 5 where the crop allele consistently conferred a selective advantage (increasing fitness to 212% and 214%), whereas on linkage group 7, a region conferred a selective disadvantage (reducing fitness to 26% and 5%), mainly through delaying flowering. The probability for a putative transgene spreading would therefore depend strongly on the insertion location. Comparison of these field results with greenhouse data from a previous study using the same lines showed considerable differences in QTL patterns. This indicates that care should be taken when extrapolating experiments from the greenhouse, and that the impact of domestication genes has to be assessed under field conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available