4.6 Article

Human-impacted landscapes facilitate hybridization between a native and an introduced tree

Journal

EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS
Volume 5, Issue 7, Pages 720-731

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2012.00250.x

Keywords

anthropogenic disturbance; interspecific hybridization; introgression; Juglans

Funding

  1. University of Notre Dame
  2. University of Tennessee
  3. The Margaret Finley Shackelford Trust
  4. United States Forest Service State and Private Forestry-Forest Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spatial and temporal dynamics of hybridization, in particular the influence of local environmental conditions, are well studied for sympatric species but less is known for native-introduced systems, especially for long-lived species. We used microsatellite and chloroplast DNA markers to characterize the influence of anthropogenic landscapes on the extent, direction, and spatial distribution of hybridization between a native North American tree Juglans cinerea (butternut) and an introduced tree Juglans ailantifolia (Japanese walnut) for 1363 trees at 48 locations across the native range of butternut. Remarkably, admixture in anthropogenic sites reached nearly 70%, while fragmented and continuous forests showed minimal admixture (<8%). Furthermore, more hybrids in anthropogenic sites had J. ailantifolia seed parents (95%) than hybrids in fragmented and continuous forests (69% and 59%, respectively). Our results show a strong influence of landscape type on rate and direction of realized gene flow. While hybrids are common in anthropogenic landscapes, our results suggest that even small forested landscapes serve as substantial barriers to hybrid establishment, a key consideration for butternut conservation planning, a species already exhibiting severe decline, and for other North American forest trees that hybridize with introduced congeners.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available