4.6 Article

Incorporating evolutionary principles into environmental management and policy

Journal

EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages 315-325

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2010.00171.x

Keywords

conservation biology; environmental management; evolution; gene flow; selection; variation

Funding

  1. NSF DEB [0918450]
  2. Danish National Research Foundation
  3. US National Science Foundation
  4. UC Davis Center for Population Biology
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences
  6. Division Of Environmental Biology [0918450] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Office Of Internatl Science &Engineering [0941759] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Office Of The Director [0941759] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As policymakers and managers work to mitigate the effects of rapid anthropogenic environmental changes, they need to consider organisms' responses. In light of recent evidence that evolution can be quite rapid, this now includes evolutionary responses. Evolutionary principles have a long history in conservation biology, and the necessary next step for the field is to consider ways in which conservation policy makers and managers can proactively manipulate evolutionary processes to achieve their goals. In this review, we aim to illustrate the potential conservation benefits of an increased understanding of evolutionary history and prescriptive manipulation of three basic evolutionary factors: selection, variation, and gene flow. For each, we review and propose ways that policy makers and managers can use evolutionary thinking to preserve threatened species, combat pest species, or reduce undesirable evolutionary changes. Such evolution-based management has potential to be a highly efficient and consistent way to create greater ecological resilience to widespread, rapid, and multifaceted environmental change.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available