4.5 Article

Sex-specific additive genetic variances and correlations for fitness in a song sparrow (Melospiza melodia) population subject to natural immigration and inbreeding

Journal

EVOLUTION
Volume 72, Issue 10, Pages 2057-2075

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/evo.13575

Keywords

Cross-sex genetic correlation; genetic groups; inbreeding depression; migration load; quantitative genetic generalized linear-mixed model; sexual conflict

Funding

  1. European Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantifying sex-specific additive genetic variance (V-A) in fitness, and the cross-sex genetic correlation (r(A)), is prerequisite to predicting evolutionary dynamics and the magnitude of sexual conflict. Further, quantifying V-A and r(A) in underlying fitness components, and genetic consequences of immigration and resulting gene flow, is required to identify mechanisms that maintain V-A in fitness. However, these key parameters have rarely been estimated in wild populations experiencing natural environmental variation and immigration. We used comprehensive pedigree and life-history data from song sparrows (Melospiza melodia) to estimate V-A and r(A) in sex-specific fitness and underlying fitness components, and to estimate additive genetic effects of immigrants alongside inbreeding depression. We found evidence of substantial V-A in female and male fitness, with a moderate positive cross-sex r(A). There was also substantial V-A in male but not female adult reproductive success, and moderate V-A in juvenile survival but not adult annual survival. Immigrants introduced alleles with negative additive genetic effects on local fitness, potentially reducing population mean fitness through migration load, but alleviating expression of inbreeding depression. Our results show that V-A for fitness can be maintained in the wild, and be broadly concordant between the sexes despite marked sex-specific V-A in reproductive success.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available