4.5 Article

THE EVOLUTION OF PHENOTYPIC CORRELATIONS AND DEVELOPMENTAL MEMORY

Journal

EVOLUTION
Volume 68, Issue 4, Pages 1124-1138

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12337

Keywords

evolvability; Adaptation; evo-devo; associative learning

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation Emerging Frontiers Award [1038657]
  2. Direct For Biological Sciences
  3. Emerging Frontiers [1038657] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Development introduces structured correlations among traits that may constrain or bias the distribution of phenotypes produced. Moreover, when suitable heritable variation exists, natural selection may alter such constraints and correlations, affecting the phenotypic variation available to subsequent selection. However, exactly how the distribution of phenotypes produced by complex developmental systems can be shaped by past selective environments is poorly understood. Here we investigate the evolution of a network of recurrent nonlinear ontogenetic interactions, such as a gene regulation network, in various selective scenarios. We find that evolved networks of this type can exhibit several phenomena that are familiar in cognitive learning systems. These include formation of a distributed associative memory that can store and recall multiple phenotypes that have been selected in the past, recreate complete adult phenotypic patterns accurately from partial or corrupted embryonic phenotypes, and generalize (by exploiting evolved developmental modules) to produce new combinations of phenotypic features. We show that these surprising behaviors follow from an equivalence between the action of natural selection on phenotypic correlations and associative learning, well-understood in the context of neural networks. This helps to explain how development facilitates the evolution of high-fitness phenotypes and how this ability changes over evolutionary time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available