4.5 Article

MALADAPTATION AS A SOURCE OF SENESCENCE IN HABITATS VARIABLE IN SPACE AND TIME

Journal

EVOLUTION
Volume 68, Issue 9, Pages 2481-2493

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12462

Keywords

Adaptation; age-structured population; quantitative genetics; senescence

Funding

  1. Ministry of Research
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-09-PEXT-011, 2010 BLAN 1715]
  3. Agropolis Fondation (Montpellier, France) [BIOFIS 1001-001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we use a quantitative genetics model of structured populations to investigate the evolution of senescence in a variable environment. Adaptation to local environments depends on phenotypic traits whose optimal values vary with age and with environmental conditions. We study different scenarios of environmental heterogeneity, where the environment changes abruptly, gradually, or cyclically with time and where the environment is heterogeneous in space with different populations connected by migration. The strength of selection decreases with age, which predicts slower adaptation of traits expressed late in the life cycle, potentially generating stronger senescence in habitats where selection changes in space or in time. This prediction is however complicated by the fact that the genetic variance also increases with age. Using numerical calculations, we found that the rate of senescence is generally increased when the environment varies. In particular, migration between different habitats is a source of senescence in heterogeneous landscapes. We also show that the rate of senescence can vary transiently when the population is not at equilibrium, with possible implications for experimental evolution and the study of invasive species. Our results highlight the need to study age-specific adaptation, as a changing environment can have a different impact on different age classes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available