4.5 Article

ESTIMATING THE DURATION OF SPECIATION FROM PHYLOGENIES

Journal

EVOLUTION
Volume 68, Issue 8, Pages 2430-2440

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12433

Keywords

Birth-death model; extinction; macroevolution; phylogeny; protracted speciation; speciation

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) through a VIDI grant
  2. CNRS
  3. French National Research Agency (ECOEVOBIO-CHEX)
  4. ANR through grant MANEGE Modeles Aleatoires en Ecologie, Genetique et Evolution [09-BLAN-0215]
  5. Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology (College de France)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Speciation is not instantaneous but takes time. The protracted birth-death diversification model incorporates this fact and predicts the often observed slowdown of lineage accumulation toward the present. The mathematical complexity of the protracted speciation model has barred estimation of its parameters until recently a method to compute the likelihood of phylogenetic branching times under this model was outlined (Lambert et al. ). Here, we implement this method and study using simulated phylogenies of extant species how well we can estimate the model parameters (rate of initiation of speciation, rate of extinction of incipient and good species, and rate of completion of speciation) as well as the duration of speciation, which is a combination of the aforementioned parameters. We illustrate our approach by applying it to a primate phylogeny. The simulations show that phylogenies often do not contain enough information to provide unbiased estimates of the speciation-initiation rate and the extinction rate, but the duration of speciation can be estimated without much bias. The estimate of the duration of speciation for the primate clade is consistent with literature estimates. We conclude that phylogenies combined with the protracted speciation model provide a promising way to estimate the duration of speciation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available