Journal
EVOLUTION
Volume 68, Issue 2, Pages 309-317Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12292
Keywords
Coevolution; cooperation; partner choice; partner fidelity feedback; public goods; quantitative genetics; screening
Categories
Funding
- University of Toronto Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
- National Science Foundation [DEB-1257938]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The paradox of mutualism is typically framed as the persistence of interspecific cooperation, despite the potential advantages of cheating. Thus, mutualism research has tended to focus on stabilizing mechanisms that prevent the invasion of low-quality partners. These mechanisms alone cannot explain the persistence of variation for partner quality observed in nature, leaving a large gap in our understanding of how mutualisms evolve. Studying partner quality variation is necessary for applying genetically explicit models to predict evolution in natural populations, a necessary step for understanding the origins of mutualisms as well as their ongoing dynamics. An evolutionary genetic approach, which is focused on naturally occurring mutualist variation, can potentially synthesize the currently disconnected fields of mutualism evolution and coevolutionary genetics. We outline explanations for the maintenance of genetic variation for mutualism and suggest approaches necessary to address them.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available