4.5 Article

EXTRA-PAIR PATERNITY AND THE VARIANCE IN MALE FITNESS IN SONG SPARROWS (MELOSPIZA MELODIA)

Journal

EVOLUTION
Volume 66, Issue 10, Pages 3111-3129

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01677.x

Keywords

ind; lifetime reproductive success; opportunity for selection; polygynandry; sexual selection; variance in fitness

Funding

  1. Royal Society
  2. Leverhulme Trust
  3. NERC
  4. NSERC
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The variance in fitness across population members can influence major evolutionary processes. In socially monogamous but genetically polygynandrous species, extra-pair paternity (EPP) is widely hypothesized to increase the variance in male fitness compared to that arising given the socially monogamous mating system. This hypothesis has not been definitively tested because comprehensive data describing males apparent (social) and realized (genetic) fitness have been lacking. We used 16 years of comprehensive social and genetic paternity data for an entire free-living song sparrow (Melospiza melodia) population to quantify and compare variances in male apparent and realized fitness, and to quantify the contribution of the variances in within-pair reproductive success (WPRS) and extra-pair reproductive success (EPRS) and their covariance to the variance in realized fitness. Overall, EPP increased the variance in male fitness by only 027% across different fitness and variance measures. This relatively small effect reflected the presence of socially unpaired males with zero apparent and low realized fitness, small covariance between WPRS and EPRS, and large variance in WPRS that was relatively unaffected by EPP. Therefore, although EPP altered individual males contributions to future generations, its impact on population-level parameters such as the opportunity for selection and effective population size was limited.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available