4.5 Article

ISOPRENE SYNTHASE GENES FORM A MONOPHYLETIC CLADE OF ACYCLIC TERPENE SYNTHASES IN THE TPS-B TERPENE SYNTHASE FAMILY

Journal

EVOLUTION
Volume 67, Issue 4, Pages 1026-1040

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12013

Keywords

Adaptation; angiosperm; chemical mechanism; isoprene synthase; phylogenetics; rosids

Funding

  1. US National Science Foundation [IOS-0950574]
  2. Direct For Biological Sciences
  3. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [0950574] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many plants emit significant amounts of isoprene, which is hypothesized to help leaves tolerate short episodes of high temperature. Isoprene emission is found in all major groups of land plants including mosses, ferns, gymnosperms, and angiosperms; however, within these groups isoprene emission is variable. The patchy distribution of isoprene emission implies an evolutionary pattern characterized by many origins or many losses. To better understand the evolution of isoprene emission, we examine the phylogenetic relationships among isoprene synthase and monoterpene synthase genes in the angiosperms. In this study we identify nine new isoprene synthases within the rosid angiosperms. We also document the capacity of a myrcene synthase in Humulus lupulus to produce isoprene. Isoprene synthases and (E)--ocimene synthases form a monophyletic group within the Tps-b clade of terpene synthases. No asterid genes fall within this clade. The chemistry of isoprene synthase and ocimene synthase is similar and likely affects the apparent relationships among Tps-b enzymes. The chronology of rosid evolution suggests a Cretaceous origin followed by many losses of isoprene synthase over the course of evolutionary history. The phylogenetic pattern of Tps-b genes indicates that isoprene emission from non-rosid angiosperms likely arose independently.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available