4.5 Article

RAPID EVOLUTION CAUSED BY POLLINATOR LOSS IN MIMULUS GUTTATUS

Journal

EVOLUTION
Volume 65, Issue 9, Pages 2541-2552

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01326.x

Keywords

Climate change; evolutionary rescue; experimental evolution; mating systems; pollinators

Funding

  1. Yosemite Fund
  2. University of Kansas
  3. [NIH GM073990]
  4. [NSF DEB-054052]
  5. [NSF DEB-1010899]
  6. Division Of Environmental Biology
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [1010899] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anthropogenic perturbations including habitat loss and emerging disease are changing pollinator communities and generating novel selection pressures on plant populations. Disruption of plant-pollinator relationships is predicted to cause plant mating system evolution, although this process has not been directly observed. This study demonstrates the immediate evolutionary effects of pollinator loss within experimental populations of a predominately outcrossing wildflower. Initially equivalent populations evolved for five generations within two pollination treatments: abundant bumblebee pollinators versus no pollinators. The populations without pollinators suffered greatly reduced fitness in early generations but rebounded as they evolved an improved ability to self-fertilize. All populations diverged in floral, developmental, and life-history traits, but only a subset of characters showed clear association with pollination treatment. Pronounced treatment effects were noted for anther-stigma separation and autogamous seed set. Dramatic allele frequency changes at two chromosomal polymorphisms occurred in the no pollinator populations, explaining a large fraction of divergence in pollen viability. The pattern of phenotypic and genetic changes in this experiment favors a sequential model for the evolution of the multitrait selfing syndrome observed throughout angiosperms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available