4.5 Article

INFERENCE OF SELECTION AND STOCHASTIC EFFECTS IN THE HOUSE MOUSE HYBRID ZONE

Journal

EVOLUTION
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages 993-1010

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01222.x

Keywords

Cline analysis; Mus musculus; reproductive isolation; speciation; X chromosome

Funding

  1. Czech Science Foundation [206/08/0640]
  2. Grant Agency of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic [IAA600930506]
  3. Czech Ministry of Education [LC06073]
  4. Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia
  5. GAJU [137/2010/P]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We explored the transition of 13 X-linked markers across two separate portions of the house mouse hybrid zone, asking whether such a comparison can distinguish the effects of selection from random factors. A heuristic search in the likelihood landscape revealed more complex likelihood profiles for data sampled in two-dimensional (2D) space relative to data sampled along a linear transect. Randomized resampling of localities analyzed for individual loci showed that deletion of sites away from the zone center can decrease cline width estimates whereas deletion of sites close to the center can significantly increase the width estimates. Deleting localities for all loci resulted in wider clines if the number of samples from the center was limited. The results suggest that, given the great variation in width estimates resulting from inclusion/exclusion of sampling sites, the geographic sampling design is important in hybrid zone studies and that our inferences should take into account measures of uncertainty such as support intervals. The comparison of the two transects indicates cline widths are narrower for loci in the central part of the X chromosome, suggesting selection is stronger in this region and genetic incompatibilities may have at least partly common architecture in the house mouse hybrid zone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available