4.5 Article

FITTING MODELS OF CONTINUOUS TRAIT EVOLUTION TO INCOMPLETELY SAMPLED COMPARATIVE DATA USING APPROXIMATE BAYESIAN COMPUTATION

Journal

EVOLUTION
Volume 66, Issue 3, Pages 752-762

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01474.x

Keywords

Approximate Bayesian computation; Brownian motion; Carnivora; comparative methods; evolutionary rates; incomplete phylogenies

Funding

  1. NSF [DEB 0918748, DEB 0919499]
  2. National Evolutionary Synthesis Center [NSF EF-0423641]
  3. Searle Scholar Program
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [0918748] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Environmental Biology [0918748] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Environmental Biology
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [0919499] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, a suite of methods has been developed to fit multiple rate models to phylogenetic comparative data. However, most methods have limited utility at broad phylogenetic scales because they typically require complete sampling of both the tree and the associated phenotypic data. Here, we develop and implement a new, tree-based method called MECCA (Modeling Evolution of Continuous Characters using ABC) that uses a hybrid likelihood/approximate Bayesian computation (ABC)-Markov-Chain Monte Carlo approach to simultaneously infer rates of diversification and trait evolution from incompletely sampled phylogenies and trait data. We demonstrate via simulation that MECCA has considerable power to choose among single versus multiple evolutionary rate models, and thus can be used to test hypotheses about changes in the rate of trait evolution across an incomplete tree of life. We finally apply MECCA to an empirical example of body size evolution in carnivores, and show that there is no evidence for an elevated rate of body size evolution in the pinnipeds relative to terrestrial carnivores. ABC approaches can provide a useful alternative set of tools for future macroevolutionary studies where likelihood-dependent approaches are lacking.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available