Journal
EVOLUTION
Volume 64, Issue 1, Pages 1-24Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00844.x
Keywords
Chromosomal incompatibility; comparative analysis; Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities; reproductive isolation; reinforcement
Categories
Funding
- NERC
- BBSRC
- DEFRA-Darwin Initiative
- European Commission [HPMF-CT-2001-01230]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Under simple assumptions, the evolution of epistatic Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities between a pair of species should yield an accelerating decline of log overall reproductive compatibility-a snowball effect that might rapidly provide new species with reality. Possible alternatives include: (1) simple exponential failure, giving a linear rate of log compatibility loss, and (2) slow-down, likely during reinforcement in which mate choice evolves to prevent deleterious hybridization, yielding a decelerating log compatibility loss. In analyses of multiple datasets, we find little support for the snowball effect, except possibly in Lepidoptera hybrid viability. The snowball predicts a slow initial rate of incompatibility acquisition, with low initial variance; instead, highly variable compatibility is almost universally observed at low genetic distances. Another deviation from predictions is that reproductive isolation usually remains incomplete until long after speciation. These results do not disprove snowball compatibility decay, but can result if large deleterious effects are due to relatively few genetic changes, or if different types of incompatibility evolve at very different rates. On the other hand, data on Bacillus and Saccharomyces, as well as theories of chromosomal evolution, suggest that some kinds of incompatibility accumulate approximately linearly, without Dobzhansky-Muller effects. In microorganisms, linearity can result from direct negative effects of DNA sequence divergence on compatibility. Finally, a decelerating slowdown model is supported for sympatric Leptasterias starfish, and in Drosophila prezygotic isolation in sympatry but not allopatry, providing novel comparative evidence for reinforcement.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available