4.5 Article

THE CONTRIBUTION OF GENE MOVEMENT TO THE TWO RULES OF SPECIATION

Journal

EVOLUTION
Volume 64, Issue 6, Pages 1541-1557

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.00990.x

Keywords

Gene relocation; genomics; hybrid incompatibility; sterility; X chromosome

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB-0532097, DEB-0841957, DBI-0543586, DBI-0845494]
  2. Direct For Biological Sciences
  3. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [0845494] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Division Of Environmental Biology
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [0841957] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The two rules of speciation-the Large X-effect and Haldane's rule-hold throughout the animal kingdom, but the underlying genetic mechanisms that cause them are still unclear. Two predominant explanations-the dominance theory and faster male evolution-both have some empirical support, suggesting that the genetic basis of these rules is likely multifarious. We revisit one historical explanation for these rules, based on dysfunctional genetic interactions involving genes recently moved between chromosomes. We suggest that gene movement specifically off or onto the X chromosome is another mechanism that could contribute to the two rules, especially as X chromosome movements can be subject to unique sex-specific and sex chromosome specific consequences in hybrids. Our hypothesis is supported by patterns emerging from comparative genomic data, including a strong bias in interchromosomal gene movements involving the X and an overrepresentation of male reproductive functions among chromosomally relocated genes. In addition, our model indicates that the contribution of gene movement to the two rules in any specific group will depend upon key developmental and reproductive parameters that are taxon specific. We provide several testable predictions that can be used to assess the importance of gene movement as a contributor to these rules in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available