4.5 Article

RELATIVE CONTRIBUTION OF ADDITIVE, DOMINANCE, AND IMPRINTING EFFECTS TO PHENOTYPIC VARIATION IN BODY SIZE AND GROWTH BETWEEN DIVERGENT SELECTION LINES OF MICE

Journal

EVOLUTION
Volume 63, Issue 5, Pages 1118-1128

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00638.x

Keywords

Epigenetics; genomic imprinting; mice; phenotypic variation; QTL; weight

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, UK (BBSRC)
  2. NIH [DK055736]
  3. NERC
  4. NERC [NE/F013418/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/C516936/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/F013418/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Epigenetic effects attributed to genomic imprinting are increasingly recognized as an important source of variation in quantitative traits. However, little is known about their relative contribution to phenotypic variation compared to those of additive and dominance effects, and almost nothing about their role in phenotypic evolution. Here we address these questions by investigating the relative contribution of additive, dominance, and imprinting effects of quantitative trait loci (QTL) to variation in early and late body weight in an intercross of mice selected for divergent adult body weight. We identified 18 loci on 13 chromosomes; additive effects accounted for most of the phenotypic variation throughout development, and imprinting effects were always small. Genetic effects on early weight showed more dominance, less additive, and, surprisingly, less imprinting variation than that of late weight. The predominance of additivity of QTL effects on body weight follows the expectation that additive effects account for the evolutionary divergence between selection lines. We hypothesize that the appearance of more imprinting effects on late body weight may be a consequence of divergent selection on adult body weight, which may have indirectly selected for alleles showing partial imprinting effects due to their associated additive effects, highlighting a potential role of genomic imprinting in the response to selection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available