4.5 Article

FLUCTUATING ASYMMETRY DOES NOT CONSISTENTLY REFLECT SEVERE DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS IN HUMAN FETUSES

Journal

EVOLUTION
Volume 63, Issue 7, Pages 1832-1844

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00675.x

Keywords

Congenital abnormalities; developmental instability; fluctuating asymmetry; human fetuses; phenodeviance; prenatal development; stillbirths

Funding

  1. Foundation-Flanders (FWO) [G.0025.07]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Developmental instability (DI), as measured by fluctuating asymmetry ( FA), may reflect fitness and facilitate the expression of morphological variation. Insights in the underlying mechanisms and magnitude of DI during early development would increase our understanding of its role in evolutionary biology. We studied associations between FA and congenital abnormalities of different origins and functional systems in deceased human fetuses. Major congenital abnormalities corresponded to severe, often-lethal developmental disorders disrupting normal development from early organogenesis onward, but only moderately increased FA. Lower FA with age also supported the hypothesis that more severe abnormalities, leading to an earlier death, increased DI. Although FA related significantly to measures of fitness or health, we anticipated stronger associations because fetal health problems were detrimental. Furthermore, elevated FA occurred in only 4 of 17 disorders (left-right patterning, limb defects, and problems of bronchopulmonary and urogenital system). Fetuses experiencing major abnormalities other than these four types did not show increased FA. This suggests that the functional importance of symmetry in limbs has resulted in strong selection for symmetry and reduced its sensitivity to stress. Finally, the observed patterns suggest that specific developmental pathways have a stronger effect on DI than others do.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available