4.5 Review

Ecological reproductive isolation of coast and inland races of Mimulus guttatus

Journal

EVOLUTION
Volume 62, Issue 9, Pages 2196-2214

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00457.x

Keywords

adaptation; drought; flowering time; population structure; salt tolerance; speciation

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DBI-0328636]
  2. Doctoral Dissertation Improvement [DEB-0710094]
  3. Environmental Genomics [EF-0723814]
  4. National Institute of Health
  5. Duke University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adaptive divergence due to habitat differences is thought to play a major role in formation of new species. However it is rarely clear the extent to which individual reproductive isolating barriers related to habitat differentiation contribute to total isolation. Furthermore, it is often difficult to determine the specific environmental variables that drive the evolution of those ecological barriers, and the geographic scale at which habitat-mediated speciation occurs. Here, we address these questions through an analysis of the population structure and reproductive isolation between coastal perennial and inland annual forms of the yellow monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus. We found substantial morphological and molecular genetic divergence among populations derived from coast and inland habitats. Reciprocal transplant experiments revealed nearly complete reproductive isolation between coast and inland populations mediated by selection against immigrants and flowering time differences, but not postzygotic isolation. Our results suggest that selection against immigrants is a function of adaptations to seasonal drought in inland habitat and to year round soil moisture and salt spray in coastal habitat. We conclude that the coast and inland populations collectively comprise distinct ecological races. Overall, this study suggests that adaptations to widespread habitats can lead to the formation of reproductively isolated species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available