4.7 Article

Physical Activity and Adiposity Markers at Older Ages: Accelerometer Vs Questionnaire Data

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.01.086

Keywords

Physical activity; accelerometer; questionnaire; adiposity; body mass index; waist circumference

Funding

  1. US National Institutes of Health [R01AG013196, R01AG034454, R01HL036310]
  2. UK Medical Research Council [K013351]
  3. British Heart Foundation [PG/29605]
  4. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/J023299]
  5. ESRC [ES/J023299/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. MRC [MR/K013351/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Economic and Social Research Council [1223506, ES/J023299/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Medical Research Council [MR/K013351/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Physical activity is critically important for successful aging, but its effect on adiposity markers at older ages is unclear as much of the evidence comes from self-reported data on physical activity. We assessed the associations of questionnaire-assessed and accelerometer-assessed physical activity with adiposity markers in older adults. Design/Setting/Participants: This was a cross-sectional study on 3940 participants (age range 60-83 years) of the Whitehall II study who completed a 20-item physical activity questionnaire and wore a wrist-mounted accelerometer for 9 days in 2012 and 2013. Measurements: Total physical activity was estimated using metabolic equivalent hours/week for the questionnaire and mean acceleration for the accelerometer. Time spent in moderate-and-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was also assessed by questionnaire and accelerometer. Adiposity assessment included body mass index, waist circumference, and fat mass index. Fat mass index was calculated as fat mass/height(2) (kg/m(2)), with fat mass estimated using bioimpedance. Results: Greater total physical activity was associated with lower adiposity for all adiposity markers in a dose-response manner. In men, the strength of this association was 2.4 to 2.8 times stronger with the accelerometer than with questionnaire data. In women, it was 1.9 to 2.3 times stronger. For MVPA, questionnaire data in men suggested no further benefit for adiposity markers past 1 hour/week of activity. This was not the case for accelerometer-assessed MVPA where, for example, compared with men undertaking <1 hour/week of accelerometer-assessed MVPA, waist circumference was 3.06 (95% confidence interval 2.06-4.06) cm lower in those performing MVPA 1-2.5 hours/week, 4.69 (3.47-5.91) cm lower in those undertaking 2.5-4 hours/week, and 7.11 (5.93-8.29) cm lower in those performing >= 4 hours/week. Conclusions: The association of physical activity with adiposity markers in older adults was stronger when physical activity was assessed by accelerometer compared with questionnaire, suggesting that physical activity might be more important for adiposity than previously estimated. (C) 2015 AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available