4.3 Article

Cornel Iridoid Glycoside Attenuates Tau Hyperphosphorylation by Inhibition of PP2A Demethylation

Journal

Publisher

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2013/108486

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81274120]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [7132110]
  3. Beijing Science and Technology Program [Z131102002813066]
  4. Beijing Key Foundation of Traditional Chinese Medicine [KJTS2011-04]
  5. Capital Health Development Scientific Grant [2011-1001-05]
  6. Beijing Health and Technical Personal of High-Level Plan [2009-3-66, 2011-1-7]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of cornel iridoid glycoside (CIG) on tau hyperphosphorylation induced by wortmannin (WT) and GF-109203X (GFX) and the underlying mechanisms. Methods. Human neuroblastoma SK-N-SH cells were preincubated with CIG (50, 100, and 200 mu g/ml, resp.) for 24 h and then exposed to 10 mu M WT and 10 mu M GFX for 3 h after washing out CIG. Immunohistochemistry was used to observe the microtubular cytoskeleton of the cultured cells. Western blotting was used to measure the phosphorylation level of tau protein, glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta (GSK-3 beta), and protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A). The activity of PP2A was detected by a biochemical assay. Results. Preincubation of CIG significantly attenuated the WT/GFX-induced tau hyperphosphorylation at the sites of Thr205, Thr212, Ser214, Thr217, Ser396, and PHF-1 and improved the damage of morphology and microtubular cytoskeleton of the cells. CIG did not prevent the decrease in p-AKT-ser473 and p-GSK-3 beta-ser9 induced by WT/GFX. However, CIG significantly elevated the activity of PP2A by reducing the demethylation of PP2A catalytic subunit (PP2Ac) at Leu309 and the ratio of PME-1/LCMT in the WT/GFX-treated cells. The results suggest that CIG may be beneficial to the treatment of AD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available