4.6 Article

Methylomic Aging as a Window onto the Influence of Lifestyle: Tobacco and Alcohol Use Alter the Rate of Biological Aging

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
Volume 63, Issue 12, Pages 2519-2525

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jgs.13830

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R21DA034457]
  2. Center for Translational and Prevention Science - National Institute on Drug Abuse [P30DA02782]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectivesTo examine the effect of the relationship between alcohol and cigarette consumption on biological aging using deoxyribonucleic acid methylation-based indices. DesignHierarchical linear regression modeling followed by fitting of higher-order effects. SettingLongitudinal studies of aging and the effect of psychosocial stress. ParticipantsParticipants in two ethnically informative cohorts (n = 656 white, n = 180 black). MeasurementsDeviation of biological age from chronological age as a result of smoking and alcohol consumption. ResultsGreater cigarette consumption was associated with accelerated biological aging, with strong effects evident at even low levels of exposure. In contrast, alcohol consumption was associated with a mixed effect on biological aging and pronounced nonlinear effects. At low and heavy levels of alcohol consumption, there was accelerated biological aging, whereas at intermediate levels of consumption there was a relative decelerating effect. The decelerating effects of alcohol were particularly notable at loci for which methylation increased with age. ConclusionThese data support prior epidemiological studies indicating that moderate alcohol use is associated with healthy aging, but we urge caution in interpreting these results. Conversely, smoking has strong negative effects at all levels of consumption. These results also support the use of methylomic indices as a tool for assessing the impact of lifestyle on aging.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available