4.6 Article

The Periprostatic Autonomic Nerves-Bundle or Layer?

Journal

EUROPEAN UROLOGY
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages 1109-1117

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.06.007

Keywords

Cavernous nerves; Continence; Erectile function; Neurovascular bundle; Periprostatic nerve tissue; Radical prostatectomy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The functional outcome of a nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (RP) depends on the knowledge of autonomic nerve distribution in correlation to the prostate. Objective: Recent literature has focused predominantly on the anterior prostate; this study evaluates the nerve distribution on the entire prostate, using a two-dimensional approach. Design, setting, and participants: From 17 non-nerve-sparing (NS) RP specimens, 77 whole mounted serial sections were immunostained with PGP9.5 and analyzed. Intervention: Each prostate half was divided into 12 sectors (three levels: apex, mid-part, base; four courses: anterior, anterolateral, posterolateral, posterior). Measurements: The extracapsular nerves were counted and classified by size (>200 mu m or <200 mu m). Results and limitations: Approximately two-thirds of the nerves were located in the posterolateral while 26.3/27.0% were located in the anterior and anterolateral. In the anterolateral, along the base-apex direction, the nerves decreased whereas they increased in the posterior. In the anterior, the highest counts were found in the mid-prostate. PGP 9.5 stain helps to determine the extracapsular nerve distribution, however, it does not allow a functional allocation. Conclusions: The nerve course expands from the base in the mid-part to the anterior sector, before it narrows towards the apex in the posterior lateral and posterior sectors. Therefore, it is recommended that the surgeon focus on nerve preservation in particular at the apex, starting in the anterior at the mid section as well as the common posterolateral course. (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available