4.1 Article

Aneurysm-Express: Human Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Wall Expression in Relation to Heterogeneity and Vascular Events - Rationale and Design

Journal

EUROPEAN SURGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages 34-40

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000318160

Keywords

Aortic aneurysm, abdominal; Aortic diseases; Biobank; Biomarker; Cardiovascular outcome; Heterogeneity

Categories

Funding

  1. Leatare
  2. Concordia trajectina

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Large amounts of AAA tissue are necessary to assess heterogeneity among AAA and to correct for potential confounders such as known risk factors. The Aneurysm-express study aims to identify different types of AAA using inflammatory markers in the aneurysm wall that predict postoperative cardiovascular adverse events and mortality, therefore allowing individual risk assessment. Methods: The Aneurysm-express is an ongoing prospective cohort study including AAA patients undergoing open repair. At baseline, blood is drawn, relevant clinical data are collected and the standard diagnostic modalities are performed. During surgery a specimen of the ventral AAA wall is collected and processed to study protein expressions and histology. Interim Results: The study commenced in 2003 in 2 medical centers and currently holds information and material of >300 AAA patients, making it the largest reported aneurysm biobank. Patients are followed for 3 years after surgery for occurring cardiovascular events. The current mean follow- up is 2.1 +/- 1.3 years with an event rate of 27%. Conclusion: The large amount of structurally stored tissue and blood combined with clinical characteristics and follow- up provide an excellent soil for in-depth pathophysiological analyses, with assessment of AAA heterogeneity in combination with postoperative clinical outcome. Copyright (C) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available