4.1 Article

Selenoprotein P, Rather than Glutathione Peroxidase, as a Potential Marker of Septic Shock and Related Syndromes

Journal

EUROPEAN SURGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages 338-347

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000239763

Keywords

Sepsis; Shock; Endothelium; Reactive oxygen species; Systemic inflammatory response syndrome; Free radicals; Antioxidants

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aims: Oxidative stress is involved in sepsis-related endothelium dysfunction. Selenoprotein-P (Sel-P), the main plasma selenoprotein, may have high antioxidant potential, and binds to endothelium. We hypothesize that, in septic shock, and similar syndromes such as systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), Sel-P binds massively to endothelium, causing a drop in Sel-P plasma concentration. Methods: Plasma Se, Sel-P and albumin concentrations, and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity were measured in patients with septic shock and SIRS with organ failure (S group, n = 7 and n = 3, respectively) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and compared to non-SIRS patients (NS group, n = 11) and healthy volunteers (HV group, n = 7). Results: On ICU admission, plasma Sel-P concentrations were 70% lower in the S group than in the other groups [15 (10-26) vs. 44 (29 71) and 50 (45-53) nmol/l] and were lower in nonsurviving septic-shock patients. GPx activity did not differ between groups. Sel-P was significantly lower before ICU death in the 3 deceased patients of the S group (septic shock) than in the 3 patients of the non-SIRS group. Conclusions: Early decrease in Sel-P plasma concentrations was specifically observed in septic shock and was similar in SIRS patients whereas GPx activity remained unchanged. Further studies are needed to determine whether Sel-P can be an early marker of septic shock linked to microvascular injury. Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available