4.7 Article

Ablation of Stable VTs Versus Substrate Ablation in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy The VISTA Randomized Multicenter Trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 66, Issue 25, Pages 2872-2882

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.026

Keywords

amiodarone; catheter ablation; ischemic cardiomyopathy; myocardial infarction; outcomes; ventricular tachycardia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND Catheter ablation reduces ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence and implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks in patients with VT and ischemic cardiomyopathy. The most effective catheter ablation technique is unknown. OBJECTIVES This study determined rates of VT recurrence in patients undergoing ablation limited to clinical VT along with mappable VTs(clinical ablation) versus substrate-based ablation. METHODS Subjects with ischemic cardiomyopathy and hemodynamically tolerated VT were randomized to clinical ablation (n = 60) versus substrate-based ablation that targeted all abnormal electrograms in the scar (n = 58). Primary endpoint was recurrence of VT. Secondary endpoints included periprocedural complications, 12-month mortality, and rehospitalizations. RESULTS At 12-month follow-up, 9 (15.5%) and 29 (48.3%) patients had VT recurrence in substrate-based and clinical VT ablation groups, respectively (log-rank p < 0.001). More patients undergoing clinical VT ablation (58%) were on antiarrhythmic drugs after ablation versus substrate-based ablation (12%; p < 0.001). Seven (12%) patients with substrate ablation and 19 (32%) with clinical ablation required rehospitalization (p = 0.014). Overall 12-month mortality was 11.9%; 8.6% in substrate ablation and 15.0% in clinical ablation groups, respectively (log-rank p = 0.21). Combined incidence of rehospitalization and mortality was significantly lower with substrate ablation (p = 0.003). Periprocedural complications were similar in both groups (p = 0.61). CONCLUSIONS An extensive substrate-based ablation approach is superior to ablation targeting only clinical and stable VTs in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy presenting with tolerated VT. (Ablation of Clinical Ventricular Tachycardia Versus Addition of Substrate Ablation on the Long Term Success Rate of VT Ablation (VISTA); NCT01045668) (C) 2015 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available