4.7 Article

Clinical Trial Design Principles and Endpoint Definitions for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair and Replacement: Part 2: Endpoint Definitions A Consensus Document From the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 66, Issue 3, Pages 308-321

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.05.049

Keywords

heart failure; mitral regurgitation; mitral valve; valve intervention; valve surgery (or cardiac surgery)

Funding

  1. Abbott Vascular
  2. Boston Scientific
  3. Cardiac Dimensions
  4. Cordis
  5. Edwards Lifesciences
  6. Guided Delivery Systems Inc.
  7. Mitralign
  8. Medtronic
  9. Valtech
  10. Cardiac Dimensions, Inc.
  11. AstraZeneca
  12. Bristol-Myers Squibb/Sanofi-Aventis
  13. Lilly/Daiichi Sankyo
  14. Biosense Webster
  15. St. Jude Medical
  16. The Medicines Company
  17. Bayer
  18. Cardiorentis
  19. European Union
  20. Novartis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is one of the most prevalent valve disorders and has numerous etiologies, including primary (organic) MR, due to underlying degenerative/structural mitral valve (MV) pathology, and secondary (functional) MR, which is principally caused by global or regional left ventricular remodeling and/or severe left atrial dilation. Diagnosis and optimal management of MR requires integration of valve disease and heart failure specialists, MV cardiac surgeons, interventional cardiologists with expertise in structural heart disease, and imaging experts. The introduction of transcatheter MV therapies has highlighted the need for a consensus approach to pragmatic clinical trial design and uniform endpoint definitions to evaluate outcomes in patients with MR. The Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium is a collaboration between leading academic research organizations and physician-scientists specializing in MV disease from the United States and Europe. Three in-person meetings were held in Virginia and New York during which 44 heart failure, valve, and imaging experts, MV surgeons and interventional cardiologists, clinical trial specialists and statisticians, and representatives from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration considered all aspects of MV pathophysiology, prognosis, and therapies, culminating in a 2-part document describing consensus recommendations for clinical trial design (Part 1) and endpoint definitions (Part 2) to guide evaluation of transcatheter and surgical therapies for MR. The adoption of these recommendations will afford robustness and consistency in the comparative effectiveness evaluation of new devices and approaches to treat MR. These principles may be useful for regulatory assessment of new transcatheter MV devices, as well as for monitoring local and regional outcomes to guide quality improvement initiatives. (C) 2015 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available