4.5 Article

Reciprocal changes in cervical spine alignment after corrective thoracolumbar deformity surgery

Journal

EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 552-559

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2953-8

Keywords

Spinal deformity surgery; Cervical spine lordosis; Global sagittal balance

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea
  2. Korean Government [2011-0011066]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0011066] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To identify changes in cervical alignment parameters following surgical correction of thoracolumbar deformity and then assess the preoperative parameters which induce changes in cervical alignment following corrective thoracolumbar deformity surgery. A retrospective study of 49 patients treated for thoracolumbar deformity with preoperative planning of an acceptably aligned coronal and sagittal plane in each case. We compared cervical spine parameters in two distinct low [preoperative C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) a parts per thousand currency sign6 cm] and high (preoperative C7 SVA a parts per thousand yen9 cm) C7 SVA groups. Multilinear regression analysis was performed and revealed the relationship between postoperative cervical lordosis and preoperative spinopelvic parameters and surgical plans. In the lower C7 SVA group, cervical lordosis was significantly increased after thoracic/lumbar deformity correction (p < 0.01). In contrast, the high C7 SVA group showed decreased cervical lordosis postoperatively (p < 0.01). Multilinear regression analysis demonstrated the preoperative parameters (preoperative C2-7 angle, T1 slope, surgical plan for PT and C7 SVA), which determine the postoperative cervical lordosis. In spinal deformity procedures, preoperative spinal alignment parameters, and surgical plans could affect postoperative cervical spine alignment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available