Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Percutaneous techniques in the thoracic and lumbar spine
T. R. Blattert et al.
UNFALLCHIRURG (2011)
Multifidus muscle changes and clinical effects of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: minimally invasive procedure versus conventional open approach
ShunWu Fan et al.
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL (2010)
Comparison of paraspinal muscle injury in one-level lumbar posterior inter-body fusion: modified minimally invasive and traditional open approaches
Shun-wu Fan et al.
Orthopaedic Surgery (2010)
Perioperative and short-term advantages of mini-open approach for lumbar spinal fusion
J. Rodriguez-Vela et al.
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL (2009)
Comparison of the Percutaneous Screw Placement Precision of Isocentric C-arm 3-dimensional Fluoroscopy-navigated Pedicle Screw Implantation and Conventional Fluoroscopy Method With Minimally Invasive Surgery
Hiroaki Nakashima et al.
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES (2009)
Minimally invasive percutaneous instrumentation for spine fractures
A. Prokop et al.
UNFALLCHIRURG (2009)
Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach
Yung Park et al.
SPINE (2007)
Percutaneous dorsal versus open instrumentation for fractures of the thoracolumbar border. A comparative, prospective study
R Grass et al.
UNFALLCHIRURG (2006)
Volumetric spinal canal intrusion - A comparison between thoracic pedicle screws and thoracic hooks
DW Polly et al.
SPINE (2004)
In vivo accuracy of thoracic pedicle screws
PJ Belmont et al.
SPINE (2001)
Share Paper
