Journal
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages 1301-1310Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2155-9
Keywords
Spine stabilisation exercise therapy; Outcome; Chronic low back pain
Categories
Funding
- Swiss National Science Foundation [405340-104787/2]
- Schulthess Klinik Research Funds
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Various studies have shown that spine stabilisation exercise therapy elicits improvements in symptoms/disability in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (cLBP). However, few have corroborated the intended mechanism of action by examining whether clinical improvements (1) are greater in patients with functional deficits of the targeted muscles and (2) correlate with post-treatment improvements in abdominal muscle function. Pre and directly after 9 weeks' therapy, 32 cLBP patients (44.0 +/- A 12.3 years) rated their LBP intensity (0-10) and disability (0-24, Roland-Morris; RM) and completed psychological questionnaires. At the same timepoints, the voluntary activation of transversus abdominis (TrA), obliquus internus and obliquus externus during abdominal-hollowing and the anticipatory (feedforward) activation of these muscles during rapid arm movements were measured using M-mode ultrasound with tissue Doppler imaging. Pre-therapy to post-therapy, RM decreased from 8.9 +/- A 4.7 to 6.7 +/- A 4.3, and average pain, from 4.7 +/- A 1.7 to 3.5 +/- A 2.3 (each P < 0.01). The ability to voluntarily activate TrA increased by 4.5% (P = 0.045) whilst the anticipatory activation of the lateral abdominal muscles showed no significant change (P > 0.05). There was no significant correlation between the change in RM scores after therapy and either baseline values for voluntary (r = 0.24, P = 0.20) or anticipatory activation (r = 0.04, P = 0.84), or their changes after therapy (voluntary, r = 0.08, P = 0.66; anticipatory, r = 0.16, P = 0.40). In multiple regression, only a reduction in catastrophising (P = 0.0003) and in fingertip-floor distance (P = 0.0006) made unique contributions to explaining the variance in the reduction in RM scores. Neither baseline lateral abdominal muscle function nor its improvement after a programme of stabilisation exercises was a statistical predictor of a good clinical outcome. It is hence difficult to attribute the therapeutic result to any specific effects of the exercises on these trunk muscles. The association between changes in catastrophising and outcome serves to encourage further investigation on larger groups of patients to clarify whether stabilisation exercises have some sort of central effect, unrelated to abdominal muscle function per se.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available